Rayman v. Morris
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Linn,
This was a bill for a decree that plaintiff is entitled to an undivided half interest in certain real property held by defendant on a parol trust and for a conveyance of that interest to plaintiff. The court made a decree in accord with the prayer of the bill. Defendant has appealed.
Appellant presents two questions: (1) whether the evidence is sufficient, within the rule to justify the decree and (2) whether the suit was brought in time or was barred by the Act of April 22, 1856, P. L. 532, section 6, 12 PS 83.
Our decision depends on the facts. The chancellor…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Belmont Laboratories, Inc. v. HeistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Christy v. ChristySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Wosche v. KraningSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- McLaughlin v. FultonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
- Clark v. TrindleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866
3Cited by9 opinions
- Roth v. HartlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Allardice v. McCainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Woodbridge v. HallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Zahorsky v. LeschinskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- O'Neill v. KeeganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.