Schroeffel v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Baldeige, J.,
On August 31, 1935, Anna Schroeffel, the wife plaintiff, with her arms full of packages, was leaving defendant’s store in the city of Pittsburgh. Immediately outside of the door leading to the street was a wooden platform, 23 inches Wide and 29 inches long. Its surface was 7-1/4 inches below the floor of the store and 9-1/2 inches above the sidewalk. When Mrs. Schroeffel stepped on the platform, her shoe caught on a nail sticking up half an inch at a point about 2 inches from the right front corner, and she fell to the pavement.
This suit charging defendants with…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Vetter v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Pfendler v. SpeerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Ross v. RiffleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- MacK v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Finch v. Horn & Hardart Baking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Handel v. RudnickSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Yarkosky v. the Caldwell Store, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Boal v. Electric Storage Battery Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
- Mellen v. D.L. W.R.R. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Mellen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943