Legal Opinion

Petry v. Cosmopolitan Spa International, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided June 25, 1982PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARROTT, Presiding Judge.

On August 8, 1978, appellant Shirley Pe-try contracted with Appellee, Cosmopolitan Spa International, Inc. (Cosmopolitan), for a membership in its spa which was to include “processing, program counseling and facilities usage.... ” The written contract contained the following exculpatory clause:

“Member represents that he or she is in good physical condition and able to use the equipment provided and to take the exercises recommended by Cosmopolitan. Member fully understands and agrees that in participating in one or more of the courses, or using the facilities…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Empress Health and Beauty Spa, Inc. v. TurnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Olson v. MolzenTennessee Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Dick Broadcasting Company, Inc. of Tennessee v. Oak Ridge FM, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Williamson County BroadcastIng Co. v. InterMedia PartnersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  3. Frederick Copeland v. Healthsouth/Methodist Rehabilitation Hospital, LPTennessee Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Whitson v. Goodbodys, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  5. Henderson v. Quest Expeditions, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API