Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gregware v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 4, 2015No. 108013/07 14970Published

1DissentSweeny, J.

I dissent. The record clearly reflects a pattern of highly inflammatory, prejudicial and improper comments made by plaintiffs’ counsel during his summation. Taken as a whole, those comments deprived defendants, particularly the City of New York, of a fair trial. I would therefore remand this case for a new trial on all issues.

There are certain well-settled principles established that apply to all trials. Basic to our adversarial system of justice is the principle that “all litigants, regardless of the merits of their *65case, are entitled to a fair trial” (Habenicht v R. K. O. Theatres, 23 AD2d…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Rogers & WellsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Clarke v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Caraballo v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Habenicht v. R. K. O. Theatres, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  5. Rodriguez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API