Gregware v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentSweeny, J.
I dissent. The record clearly reflects a pattern of highly inflammatory, prejudicial and improper comments made by plaintiffs’ counsel during his summation. Taken as a whole, those comments deprived defendants, particularly the City of New York, of a fair trial. I would therefore remand this case for a new trial on all issues.
There are certain well-settled principles established that apply to all trials. Basic to our adversarial system of justice is the principle that “all litigants, regardless of the merits of their *65case, are entitled to a fair trial” (Habenicht v R. K. O. Theatres, 23 AD2d…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Campbell v. Rogers & WellsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Clarke v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Caraballo v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Habenicht v. R. K. O. Theatres, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Rodriguez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.