Legal Opinion

Ralston v. Toomey

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 29, 1951No. 6178PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUMPKIN, Justice.

This suit resulted from a highway accident in which an automobile and a truck collided. The appellants, R. H. Ralston and Virgil Wil'banks, were in the automobile. The appellee Floyd Crume was the driver of the truck. The second appellee Everett Toomey, owner of the truck, was not involved in the accident. A trial to a jury resulted in a judgment in favor of the appellees and against the appellants. Toomey was awarded the sum of $850 and Crume was granted $36. From this judgment the appellants have perfected their appeal to this court.

It appears that originally, in Cause…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Snow v. StarrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  2. Wolf v. PerrymanTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Lofland v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  4. Gussett v. Nueces CountyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  5. Erwin v. WelbornCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Shell Chemical Company v. LambTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Upchurch v. BarnesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  3. American Insurance Company v. Foutz and BursumNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Cruse v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Bergeron v. City of Port ArthurCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API