Legal Opinion

Hartman v. Double L Manufacturing

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 2005No. 30372, 30392PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Justice.

This is a worker’s compensation case. The employer, its surety, and the Industrial Special Indemnity Fund (ISIF) appeal from the Industrial Commission’s December 4, 2003 findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order. Because the Industrial Commission’s decision is not a final appealable order, we dismiss the appeal and remand the matter for further proceedings.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

During Fritz Hartman’s eleven-year employment with Double L Manufacturing he was involved in three separate accidents. The third accident is the subject of Hartman’s claim for worker’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Feuling v. Farmers' Co-Operative Ditch Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Watkins v. CavanaghIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Reynolds v. Browning Ferris IndustriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Hagler v. Micron Technology, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Kindred v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mazzone v. Texas Roadhouse, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Deeds v. Regence Blueshield of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Roy Green v. Industrial Special IndemnityIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Deeds v. Regence Blueshield of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Mazzone v. Texas RoadhouseIdaho Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API