Legal Opinion
Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. Eisenstadt
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 14, 1970PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
(I)
The plaintiff has instituted this action to require the payment of a promissory note made by Carlton Management Corporation (Carlton) and the defendants, Harvey J. Eisenstadt and Mrs. Judith Eisenstadt, payable to the order of Greater New York Burner and Boiler Service, Inc. (Greater New York) and indorsed without recourse by Greater New York, by Abe Samuels, and delivered to the plaintiff bank. Carlton was also a defendant herein but judgment was obtained by the plaintiff against it by default; the action was accordingly severed and subsequent proceedings were directed by the plaintiff…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Messersmith v. . American Fidelity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Chapman v. . RoseNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Hall v. Bank of BlasdellNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Megowan v. . PetersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Casco National Bank of Portland v. ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Klapper v. Integrated Agricultural Management Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Barden & Robeson Corp. v. FerrusiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Lesser v. Todd Cigarette Service Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Ireland v. J.L.'s Auto Sales, Inc.Arcadia Justice Court · 1992