Legal Opinion
(PC) Smith v. Secretary
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 18, 2023No. 1:23-cv-00526Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LAWRENCE CHRISTOPHER SMITH, No. 1:23-cv-00526-ADA-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S “OBJECTIONS” CONSTRUED AS A 13 v. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 14 SECRETARY, et al., (ECF No. 33) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Lawrence Christopher Smith (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s “objections” to the Court’s April 21, 2023, 20 screening order. (ECF No. 33.) There…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellee, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant. Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellant, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Haines v. Liggett Group Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Westlands Water DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2001
- Kern-Tulare Water District v. City of BakersfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.