Kelleher v. Kuchta
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs appeal from an order of partial summary judgment entered in the Livingston County Circuit Court. The trial court determined that, as a matter of law, Matthew Kelleher *47had not sustained injuries which constituted a serious impairment of a body function. This case arises as a result of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Cassidy v McGovern, 415 Mich 483; 330 NW2d 22 (1982), that where there exists no factual dispute regarding the nature and extent of a plaintiff’s injuries, the trial court shall rule as a matter of law whether there has been a “serious impairment of body function”. MCL…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cassidy v. McGovernMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
3Cited by12 opinions
- DiFranco v. PickardMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Galli v. ReutterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Walker v. CaldwellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Akin v. SlocumMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Bennett v. OakleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.