Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Oakley

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 1, 1986No. Docket 85705PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Did the trial court err on June 23, 1985, by granting defendant’s motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(0(10), 1 on grounds that plaintiff Sheila D. Bennett’s injuries did not meet Michigan’s no-fault threshold for serious impairment of body function, MCL 500.3135; MSA 24.13135, as defined by Cassidy v McGovern, 415 Mich 483; 330 NW2d 22 (1982), reh den 417 Mich 1104 (1983)? We answer this question in the negative and affirm.

Plaintiff was injured August 24, 1981, when the vehicle she was driving collided with defendant’s vehicle at the intersection of Lake Lansing Road and Wood…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cassidy v. McGovernMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Williams v. PayneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Lumber Village, Inc v. SieglerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Braden v. LeeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Brookdale Cemetery Ass'n v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1955

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. DiFranco v. PickardMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Arabo v. TurnbellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. DiFranco v. PickardMichigan Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API