Legal Opinion
In Re Young
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 16, 1987No. 19-11201PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID A. SCHOLL, Bankruptcy Judge.
The instant Motion to reopen the above-captioned bankruptcy case filed by one PRISCILLA 1 FORD (referred to hereinafter as “the Movant”) presents two (2) issues in an unusual factual matrix, which makes what are both essentially simple legal issues appear to be close questions. The first issue relates to the standing of a successor-in-interest of property of a debt- or to file such a Motion. Assuming that we reach it by finding standing, the second issue relates to the standards which should be applied in determining whether to exercise our discretion…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- In re Amatex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Harold J. Hawkins and Eugenia B. Hawkins v. Landmark Finance Company, in Re Harold J. Hawkins and Eugenia B. Hawkins, DebtorsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- 15 Collier bankr.cas.2d 563, Bankr. L. Rep. P 71,437 in Re McKeesport Steel Castings Company. In Re McKeesport Steel Castings Company, Debtor. Equitable Gas Co. v. Equibank N.A., Condec Corporation. Appeal of Equitable Gas Company, a Division of Equitable Resources, Inc., MovantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In Re TashjianUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- White v. Boston (In Re White)District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1989
- Jackson v. Boulevard Mortgage Co. (In Re Nickleberry)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- In Re Nicolet, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Nintendo Co. v. Patten (In re Alpex Computer Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.