Legal Opinion

Mendoza v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 23, 1934No. 1223PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKMAN, Chief Justice.

In the court below a general demurrer was sustained to plaintiffs’ petition, and upon their declining to amend, the case was dismissed. The only question presented is whether the petition stated a cause of action, and it, therefore, becomes necessary to state the substance of the allegations. The parties will be referred to as in the trial court.

The suit was by Jesus Mendoza, a minor nine years of age, through his mother, Mrs. Georgia Mendoza as next friend, and also by Mrs. Georgia Mendoza in her own.behalf. The defendant is Texas & Pacific Railway Company, who owns,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Denison Light & Power Co. v. PattonTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Kruse v. Houston & T. C. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. MatzdorfTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Kirby Lumber Co. v. GreshamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Wimberly v. Gulf Production Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gotcher v. City of FarmersvilleTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Cowart v. MeeksTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Chekanski v. Texas & New Orleans RailroadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  4. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Gulf Refining Co. v. BeaneTexas Supreme Court · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API