Legal Opinion
Dailey v. Park
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 25, 2012No. Civil Action 05-2012 (RMU)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Denying the Plaintiff’s Motion to Enforce; Denying the Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order Reinstatement; Denying the Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike; Holding this Case in Abeyance
URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The parties in this case dispute their rights under a repurchase agreement to a condominium. With Judge Kay’s assistance, the parties drafted and signed a settlement agreement. The settlement agreement anticipated a closing date for the sale of a condominium unit and set forth contractual requirements for both parties in working toward this closing. Under the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Klute v. ShinsekiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Franklin-Mason v. PennDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Casanova v. Marathon Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- American Center for Civil Justice v. AmbushDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Datavocity Global Holdings, Inc. v. The Standard Fire Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2026
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.