Pecos & Northern Texas Railway Co. v. Rosenbloom
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP TEXAS. The facts, which involve the application and construction of the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, are stated 'in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum opinion by
Mr. Justice McReynolds,
by direction of the court.
In November, 1909, M. A. Rosenbloom was instant! killed by a ballast car beihg pushed by an engine a track No. 5 in the railway company’s switch yr Amarillo, Texas. Proceeding in behalf of herself, as next friend for her two minor children, and for the use and benefit of his parents, the deceased’s widow instituted this suit for damages in the District Court, Potter County, Texas. The, jury returned a verdict for seven thousand dollars — apportioned two thousand respectively to the widow and each child, and five hundred to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- North Carolina Railroad v. ZacharySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Illinois Central Railroad v. BehrensSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Co. v. SealeSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Kinzell v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Wabash Ry. Co. v. BridalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Hurley v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Phelps v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1962
- Bowman v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.