Legal Opinion

Bowman v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 1921No. Civ. No. 3760PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

William Bowman was an employee of the defendant, a common carrier doing an interstate business. While employed in the yards of the defendant, in the city of Los Angeles, on the sixth day of May, 1913, Bowman received certain injuries, followed by his death on the second day thereafter. He left as his surviving dependents the plaintiff Bertha Bowman and three minor children. Thereafter, on April 20, 1914, this action was commenced in the name of the parties as shown in the foregoing title, for the benefit of said widow and minor children. The action was tried on issues presented by the third…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Co. v. SealeSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Union Pac. Ry. Co. v. ArtistCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
  3. Phillips v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  4. Brown v. La Société Française De Bienfaisance MutuelleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Pecos & Northern Texas Railway Co. v. RosenbloomSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Rice v. California Lutheran HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Inderbitzen v. Lane HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Hedlund v. Sutter Medical Service Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Midland Valley R. Co. v. TownesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API