Legal Opinion
Intergraph Corporation v. Intel Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 1, 2001No. 00-1048PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
Intergraph Corporation appeals the decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, 1 granting summary judgment that Intel Corporation is licensed to practice the inventions of Intergraph’s United States Patents Nos. 4,860,192, 4,884,197, 4,933,-835, and 5,091,846 (together “the Clipper patents”), and dismissing Intergraph’s claims for patent infringement. We conclude that Intel is not licensed under these patents.
BACKGROUND
The Clipper patents relate to certain microprocessor technology developed by the Advanced Processor…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Foster-Gardner, Inc. v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- The Binghamton BridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- General Casualty Company of America, a Corporation v. Azteca Films, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tecom, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Intel Corp. v. Negotiated Data Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Universal Shelters of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Travelers Casualty & Surety of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Senate Builders and Construction Managers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.