Rybus v. Kruetzer Motor Express
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
Despite their admitted neglect to file a timely notice of intention to claim reimbursement from the special compensation fund, relators claim reimbursement from the fund pursuant to Minn. St. 1971, § 176.131, and WC Rule 28(9), Workmen’s Compensation Commission Rules of Practice. On appeal, the commission upheld the compensation judge’s denial of reimbursement in accordance with the standards set out by this court in Beson v. Carleton College, 271 Minn. 268, 136 N. W. 2d 82 (1965). We affirm.
Employee, Stanley L. Rybus, sustained an injury to his back in 1965 during the course of his…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Beson v. Carleton CollegeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Roswell v. ChavezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
- Hernandez v. Levi Strauss, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation FundCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1979
- Knaeble v. City of CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978