Legal Opinion

State v. Jackman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 14, 1986No. C9-85-2154PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

Appellant Guy Phillip Jackman appeals from his conviction for first-degree murder in the brutal-slaying of Thomas Kohrt on the morning of July 21, 1984. In Part I of a bifurcated trial the jury found that the elements of the offense had been proved and, in Part II, determined that appellant was not mentally ill. 1 He was sentenced to life imprisonment. We affirm.

After work on July 20, 1984, , appellant purchased an amphetamine commonly known as “crank,” a stimulant that counters the effects of alcohol induced sleepiness. He then went home, ate dinner, drank one or two…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. WahlbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. State v. OeveringSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. State v. BouwmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. State v. NeumannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. FloresSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. State v. BromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. State v. GrieseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  5. State v. PalmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API