Legal Opinion
Solebury Township v. Department of Environmental Protection
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 8, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
President Judge COLINS.
Solebury Township (Solebury) and Buckingham Township (Buckingham) petition for review of the Environmental Hearing Board’s (EHB) order that dismissed Solebury and Buckingham’s appeals of separate requests for attorneys’ fees and costs. These cases have been consolidated on appeal because of common questions of fact and law. Additionally, Buckingham has raised a separate issue, not directly addressed by the EHB below, asking leave to amend its request for attorneys’ fees and costs to include a request for fees and costs under Section 307(b) of the law known as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Lucchino v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Kwalwasser v. COM., DEPT. OF ENV. RES.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Big B Mining Co. v. Department of Environmental ResourcesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
3Cited by3 opinions
- Solebury Township v. Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Solebury Township v. Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Solebury Tp. v. DEPT. OF ENV. PROTECTIONCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004