Legal Opinion
Hovd v. Hayward Unified Sch. Dist.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 31, 1977No. Civ. 39790PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT. *
—This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered pursuant to an order sustaining without leave to amend respondents’ demurrer to the second amended complaint. For reasons stated herein, we affirm.
As defined in Government Code section 53050, the term “public agency” refers to “a district, public authority, public agency, and any other political subdivision or public corporation in the state, but does not include the state or a county, city and county, or city.” Section 53051 of that code requires a public agency to file with the Secretary of State and the county clerk…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Wilson v. San Francisco Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
3Cited by3 opinions
- Estate of Monica Liliana Cameron De Adams, by and through its Administrator Eliot Cobb Adams; Eliot Cobb Adams, an individual; and Natalie Danielle Cameroni-Adams, an individual v. City of San Diego, a public entity; City of San Diego Police Department, a public entity; Officer Matthew Brace, an individual; Officer Mallory Maraschielo, an individualDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2026
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1991
- Vann v. City and County of S.F.California Court of Appeal · 2023