Legal Opinion

Medvedieff v. Cities Service Oil Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 4, 1940PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HULBERT, District Judge.

By his motion to remand plaintiff challenges statements set forth in the removal petition and the issues thus raised must be determined by this court; the petitioning defendant has the burden of proof. Wilson v. Republic Iron Co., 257 U.S. 92, 42 S.Ct. 35, 66 L.Ed. 144; see also, McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Gorp., 298 U.S. 178, at page 189, 56 S.Ct. 780, 80 L.Ed. 1135.

Plaintiff brought a prior action in tMs court against the same defendant, a Pennsylvania corporation, and an associated Delaware corporation, and alleged in his complaint that the Pennsylvania…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. United States v. Wong Kim ArkSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Underhill v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Blair Holdings Corporation v. RubinsteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  2. Van Der Schelling v. U. S. News & World Report, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Pemberton v. ColonnaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Klausner v. LevyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1949
  5. Du Roure v. AlvordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API