Humana Health Plan, Inc. v. Patrick Nguyen
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1DissentWiener, Circuit Judge
I respectfully dissent in the firm conviction that the record evidence, as presented *1031to the district court on summary judgment, compels affirmance of its holdings that (1) Humana is a fiduciary with statutory standing to bring an action under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(3) on behalf of the Plan, and (2) Humana lawfully exercised its discretion, as authorized by the Plan, to recover the funds that Nguyen had received by virtue of underinsured motorists insurance.
I. Standing
As noted in the majority opinion, Humana is designated as the Plan Manager for API’s ERISA health benefits plan. The PMA states:
[Hu…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Simbaki, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- Cataldo v. United States Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Kenneth E. Wildbur, Sr. v. Arco Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.