Nield v. Pocatello Health Services, Inc.
Idaho Supreme Court
Idaho Falls, November 2012 Term.
1DissentJustice Eismann
Courts decide eases in one of two ways: (a) they apply the law to the facts and thereby arrive at the result or (b) they determine the desired result and then twist the law and/or the facts to justify it. The error made by the district judge was applying the law to the facts, which produced a result that the majority does not like.
I. To Reach Its Result, the Majority Misstates What the District Court Ruled.
The majority begins its analysis by stating that “[t]he- district court determined that Dr. *820Selznick’s affidavit was inadmissible because it did not negate possible alternate sources…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Knight v. Kirby Inland Marine Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Westberry v. Gislaved Gummi ABCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Geraldine McCULLOCK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. H.B. FULLER COMPANY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Johnny C. McClain v. Metabolife International, IncCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.