Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nield v. Pocatello Health Services, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 2014No. 38823-2011Published

Idaho Falls, November 2012 Term.

1DissentJustice Eismann

Courts decide eases in one of two ways: (a) they apply the law to the facts and thereby arrive at the result or (b) they determine the desired result and then twist the law and/or the facts to justify it. The error made by the district judge was applying the law to the facts, which produced a result that the majority does not like.

I. To Reach Its Result, the Majority Misstates What the District Court Ruled.

The majority begins its analysis by stating that “[t]he- district court determined that Dr. *820Selznick’s affidavit was inadmissible because it did not negate possible alternate sources…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Knight v. Kirby Inland Marine Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  3. Westberry v. Gislaved Gummi ABCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  4. Geraldine McCULLOCK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. H.B. FULLER COMPANY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. Johnny C. McClain v. Metabolife International, IncCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API