Legal Opinion

Fyan v. McNutt

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1934No. Docket No. 44, Calendar No. 37,082PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

This case involves plaintiff’s right to a commission of 5 per cent, on the amount paid defendant by the county of Wayne in satisfaction of a condemnation award. The circuit judge concluded that, although plaintiff, a real estate broker, was instrumental in bringing about the appropriation of defendant’s land by Wayne county, the agreement upon which the suit was based was obtained under such circumstances that the proofs revealed actionable fraud. Accordingly, a judgment of no cause of action was entered.

Defendant was the owner of a 50-acre tract, one of 16 parcels included in a 631-acre site…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Burchard v. Otis Elevator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Odorizzi v. Bloomfield School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. Jones v. Eastern Michigan MotorbusesMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Capman v. Harper-Grace HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Ginsberg v. Reliable Linen Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Monroe Bank & Trust v. Jessco Homes of Ohio, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API