Legal Opinion

Special Assembly Interim Committee on Public Morals v. Southard

California Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1939No. L. A. 16753PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

A rehearing was granted in this matter in order that a reexamination of the law applicable thereto might be made in the light of further arguments advanced in the petition for rehearing. Such reexamination has convinced us that to announce a contrary conclusion would be in disregard of established law on the subject in this and other jurisdictions, and that we would not be justified in taking such a course. The power here sought to be exercised by a single house of the legislature has uniformly been denied whenever it has been questioned. The fact that interim committees have been…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  2. McGrain v. DaughertySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Fergus v. RusselIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  4. French v. SenateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. In Re BattelleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Parker v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. People's Advocate, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Connerly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. State Ex Rel. Hamblen v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. State Ex Rel. James v. AronsonMontana Supreme Court · 1957

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API