Special Assembly Interim Committee on Public Morals v. Southard
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
A rehearing was granted in this matter in order that a reexamination of the law applicable thereto might be made in the light of further arguments advanced in the petition for rehearing. Such reexamination has convinced us that to announce a contrary conclusion would be in disregard of established law on the subject in this and other jurisdictions, and that we would not be justified in taking such a course. The power here sought to be exercised by a single house of the legislature has uniformly been denied whenever it has been questioned. The fact that interim committees have been…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- McGrain v. DaughertySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Fergus v. RusselIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
- French v. SenateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- In Re BattelleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Parker v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- People's Advocate, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Connerly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- State Ex Rel. Hamblen v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- State Ex Rel. James v. AronsonMontana Supreme Court · 1957
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.