General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Petrillo
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtMcWilliams, J.
Punitive damages is the leitmotiv; the back-drop is an action in replevin. The victim (GMAC) exhorts us to set aside the award ($5,000) of the trial judge, Moorman, J., (sitting without a jury) charging that his action was clearly erroneous. GMAC has other complaints but, by comparison, they are de minimis.
In November 1965 the appellee (Petrillo), at the time a resident of California, bought a new Chevrolet % ton pickup truck. He made a down payment of $500 and executed a conditional contract of sale for the balance which, after adding the various charges, came to $3,414.60. Later on the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. ArmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Franklin Investment Co. v. HomburgDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
- McClung-Logan Equipment Co. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore Railroad v. HoeflichCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
- Dennis v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Walls v. ReesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
- Wallander v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Associates Commercial Corp. v. WoodDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1998