Legal Opinion

General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Petrillo

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 30, 1969No. [No. 272, September Term, 1968.]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcWilliams, J.

Punitive damages is the leitmotiv; the back-drop is an action in replevin. The victim (GMAC) exhorts us to set aside the award ($5,000) of the trial judge, Moorman, J., (sitting without a jury) charging that his action was clearly erroneous. GMAC has other complaints but, by comparison, they are de minimis.

In November 1965 the appellee (Petrillo), at the time a resident of California, bought a new Chevrolet % ton pickup truck. He made a down payment of $500 and executed a conditional contract of sale for the balance which, after adding the various charges, came to $3,414.60. Later on the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. ArmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Franklin Investment Co. v. HomburgDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. McClung-Logan Equipment Co. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  4. Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore Railroad v. HoeflichCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
  5. Dennis v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1948

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Walls v. ReesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  2. Wallander v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. Associates Commercial Corp. v. WoodDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API