Legal Opinion

Wallander v. Barnes

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 14, 1996No. 71, Sept. Term, 1995PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

This case was filed in the District Court of Maryland as an action of replevin. The plaintiff, with lease financing, purchased a Mercedes automobile from a consignee who did not pay the consignor. The consignor, without lien or legal process, seized the vehicle from the possession of the plaintiff. The writ of replevin was never issued or denied, and, at trial, the requested relief was limited to damages. At issue here is the measure of damages, but the issue is complicated by the plaintiffs contention that the damages claimed are awardable in replevin, and thus may exceed the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. Keys v. Chrysler Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  4. Levi v. BoothCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882
  5. White v. WebbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1842

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dehn Motor Sales, LLC v. SchultzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  2. FURDA v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. Rohrer v. Humane Society of Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  4. 111 Scherr Lane, LLC v. Triangle General Contracting, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  5. In Re EvansUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API