Legal Opinion

Vaughn v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 30, 1950No. 33107PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

On the former appearance of this case (Vaughn v. State, 79 Ga. App. 724, 54 S. E. 2d, 511), this court held that the evidence failed to show that the defendant knew that the indorsement was forged as charged in count 2. The court stated: “The question of connecting the defendant with the forging of the check is eliminated, as the jury found him not guilty of that offense in spite of the testimony of the handwriting expert that the endorsement on the check was made by the defendant.” On this (the second) trial, the State sought by a different handwriting expert to show that the defendant…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. OppenheimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Coffey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  4. Cooper v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
  5. Jay v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. DeSacia v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Dapcevich v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  3. DeSacia v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  4. People v. BartonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. People v. BartonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API