Legal Opinion
Timothy A. Janowsky and Peggy J. Janowsky v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 17, 1990No. 89-2219PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KANNE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Timothy Janowsky seeks compensation for services rendered in his cooperation with agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. He also seeks damages for financial loss and emotional injuries. Plaintiff Peggy Janowsky seeks damages for emotional injuries allegedly suffered as a result of her husband’s activities.
I. BACKGROUND
The Janowskys jointly filed a lawsuit against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) alleging the following facts.
In 1984, Timothy Janowsky was approached by special agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. NeustadtSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Block v. NealSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Norman v. Turkey Run Community School Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Juan Villegas, Cross-Appellant v. Princeton Farms, Incorporated, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Jimmy Ray Rogers and Linda Rogers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- John L. Taylor v. Western And Southern Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Sidney S. Arst Co. v. Pipefitters Welfare Educ. Fund, Defendant-Third/party v. Michael Rand Arst and Donald Takacs, Third/partyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Johnson v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Mrs. Verdie Mae Franklin Verdie Mae Franklin, Administratrix of the Estate of Lonnie B. Franklin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Midwest Knitting Mills, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.