Legal Opinion

Conner v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 10, 1937No. 19044PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTIAN, Judge. —

The offense is theft by false pretext; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for ten years.

The prosecution proceeded under Art. 1413, P. C., which reads as follows: “The taking must be wrongful, so that if the property came into the possession of the person accused of theft by lawful means, the subsequent appropriation of it is not theft, but. if the taking, though originally lawful, was obtained by any false pretext, or with any intent to deprive the owner of the value thereof, and appropriate the property to the use and benefit of the person taking, and the same…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. . DimickNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. People v. HoffmannMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  3. People v. WhalenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. People v. LeavensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  5. State v. GermainOregon Supreme Court · 1909

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1947
  2. McMorries v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955
  3. Metzger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
  4. Carroll v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
  5. McMorries v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API