Legal Opinion

Binns v. Flaster Greenberg, PC

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 2007No. Civil Action 05-1930PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs James J. Binns and his law firm James J. Binns, P.C., (“Binns”), sued defendants J. Philip Kirchner and Peter R. Spirgel and their law firm Flaster Green-berg P.C., (“Flaster”), for business torts arising out of their legal representation of a one Michael Smeraski. Flaster has moved for summary judgment. Because Binns has failed to offer sufficient evidence to establish essential elements of his claims, the motion as to all claims is granted. 1

Facts 2

Binns is a Pennsylvania lawyer with extensive experience in complex,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Thompson Coal Co. v. Pike Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brown & Brown, Inc. v. ColaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc. v. Globus Medical, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Kia v. Imaging Sciences International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. FRANCIS v. FRANCISDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. Reviello v. Banker Life and Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API