Seeley v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Clarence Seeley, Jr., appeals his conviction for dealing in a schedule III controlled substance, as a Class A felony, and for *865being an habitual offender. Seeley raises the following three issues for our review:
1. Whether he was entitled to a jury instruction stating that he was only "briefly" within 1,000 feet of school property because the drug transaction was short in time, even though it occurred at his permanent residence;
2. Whether the State presented sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the alleged crime occurred within 1,000 feet of school…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Dill v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Chandler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Schmidt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Simpson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Albert L. Armstrong v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Clarence W. Seeley, Jr. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- SEELEY v. ZATECKYDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2020