Legal Opinion

Seeley v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 15, 2010No. 21A05-1003-CR-167PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Clarence Seeley, Jr., appeals his conviction for dealing in a schedule III controlled substance, as a Class A felony, and for *865being an habitual offender. Seeley raises the following three issues for our review:

1. Whether he was entitled to a jury instruction stating that he was only "briefly" within 1,000 feet of school property because the drug transaction was short in time, even though it occurred at his permanent residence;

2. Whether the State presented sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the alleged crime occurred within 1,000 feet of school…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Dill v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Chandler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Schmidt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Simpson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Albert L. Armstrong v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Clarence W. Seeley, Jr. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. SEELEY v. ZATECKYDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API