Legal Opinion

Matthews v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 26, 2004No. 25813PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice TOAL:

Henry Matthews (petitioner) asserts that the post-conviction relief (PCR) judge erred in dismissing his application for PCR. We hold that the PCR judge erred in finding petitioner’s trial counsel rendered effective assistance.

Factuae/Procedural Background

Petitioner pled guilty to armed robbery, attempted armed robbery, carjacking, and accessory after the fact to murder. He agreed to a thirty-year sentence for armed robbery, concurrent twenty-year sentences for attempted armed robbery, a concurrent twenty-year sentence for carjacking, and a concurrent fifteen-year sentence…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Gallman v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  3. State v. BlairSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  4. Jeter v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ridgley v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
  3. Ramirez v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  4. Ramirez v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
  5. Garren v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API