Legal Opinion

Ramirez v. State

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided July 29, 2015No. Appellate Case No. 2012-208626; No. 5337PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKonduros, J.

In this post-conviction relief (PCR) action, Ruben Ramirez contends the PCR court erred in dismissing his application for PCR and finding plea counsel was not ineffective for failing to obtain an independent competency evaluation before allowing Ramirez to plead guilty but mentally ill *356(GBMI)1 to assault and battery with intent to kill (ABWIK), kidnapping, first-degree criminal sexual conduct (CSC) with a minor, first-degree burglary, and committing a lewd act upon a child.2 We are constrained by our standard of review to affirm the PCR court’s order of dismissal.

FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Aice v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  5. Austin v. Stokes-Craven Holding Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ramirez v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  2. Ramirez v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API