Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Watts v. Cain

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 5, 1907No. 6683PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Petition in the original jurisdiction of this Court by H. E. Watts for mandamus against John J. Cain, B. M. English and G. W. Taylor, as the County Dispensary Board for Richland County. •

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Jones

The petitioner applied in the original jurisdiction of this Court for a rule requiring respondents to show cause why they should not be perpetually enjoined from bottling beer for sale and maintaining an establishment for such bottling.

The respondents made answer to the rule issued and also submitted a demurrer to the petition for insufficiency. By an order, filed June 14, 1907, this Court dismissed the petition and the reasons therefore will now be briefly stated.

1 The answer raised a preliminary question, that the name of the State…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Joplin v. Southwest Missouri Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. County of Wilson v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Ex parte Florence SchoolSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
  4. Milster v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  5. Lord v. BatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ross v. LipscombSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
  2. Beattie v. City CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
  3. Craig v. BellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  4. Nexsen v. WardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API