Legal Opinion

Schanberg v. Automobile Insurance Co. of Hartford

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 14, 1934PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

This is an action by the holders of a real estate mortgage for $2,500, on a policy of insurance against fire in the standard form prescribed by G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 175, § 99, made payable to the plaintiffs as mortgagees. One Thomas Doyle was the mortgagor. A loss by fire amounting to $2,110 occurred two days after an entry by the plaintiffs for the purpose of foreclosing the mortgage, and a foreclosure sale under the power of sale in the mortgage, at which the property was bid in by the plaintiffs for $1,000. The auctioneer made a sufficient memorandum to satisfy the statute of frauds. One of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hood v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  2. Beal v. Attleborough Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  3. Oakes v. Manufacturers' Fire & Marine InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  4. Dennett v. PerkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  5. Libman v. LevensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Guempel v. Great American InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  2. Outpost Cafe, Inc. v. Fairhaven Savings BankMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
  3. In Re CrichlowUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
  4. Davis v. Newburyport Five Cents Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  5. Charlestown Five Cents Sav. Bank v. WhiteDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API