Schanberg v. Automobile Insurance Co. of Hartford
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
This is an action by the holders of a real estate mortgage for $2,500, on a policy of insurance against fire in the standard form prescribed by G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 175, § 99, made payable to the plaintiffs as mortgagees. One Thomas Doyle was the mortgagor. A loss by fire amounting to $2,110 occurred two days after an entry by the plaintiffs for the purpose of foreclosing the mortgage, and a foreclosure sale under the power of sale in the mortgage, at which the property was bid in by the plaintiffs for $1,000. The auctioneer made a sufficient memorandum to satisfy the statute of frauds. One of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hood v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Beal v. Attleborough Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Oakes v. Manufacturers' Fire & Marine InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- Dennett v. PerkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Libman v. LevensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Guempel v. Great American InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
- Outpost Cafe, Inc. v. Fairhaven Savings BankMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
- In Re CrichlowUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- Davis v. Newburyport Five Cents Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Charlestown Five Cents Sav. Bank v. WhiteDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.