Legal Opinion
Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Nagle, Atty. Gen.
District Court, D. Montana
Decided August 28, 1939No. 3010PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRAY, District Judge.
Since the former opinion of the Court was filed on October 1, 1936, D.C., 16 F. Supp. 532, in the above cause, a master pro hac vice was appointed to hear and examine witnesses and record or cause to be recorded the testimony and evidence, and make report to the Court. The report has been filed and briefs submitted by counsel for the respective parties. After the former hearing it seemed necessary to present further evidence in respect to train service at Lewistown and Sweet Grass, and in that connection the Court said: “In the present state of doubt on this phase of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Great Northern Ry. Co. v. NagleDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1936
3Cited by5 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Public Service CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1948
- Chicago, M., St. P. & P. R. Co. v. Board of Railroad Comm'rs.Montana Supreme Court · 1953
- Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. Board of Railroad Com'rs of StateDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1942
- Chicago, B. & Q. R. v. Board of Railroad Com'rsDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1947
- Chicago, B. & Q. R. v. Board of Railroad Com'rsDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1947