Legal Opinion
Chicago, B. & Q. R. v. Board of Railroad Com'rs
District Court, D. Montana
Decided November 19, 1947No. 845PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
PRAY, District Judge.
This is an action by plaintiff to restrain the defendant, Board of Railroad Commissioners of Montana (hereinafter referred to as the Board), from enforcing an order which would require the plaintiff to restore to service, between Wyola and Billings, Montana, two passenger trains, No. 41 and No. 44, which were ordered discontinued by the Office of Defense Transportation in 1942, and which order was withdrawn in 1945. After a hearing and rehearing, the said Board on June 24, 1946, ordered the plaintiff to restore the two passenger trains to service between the two places…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. McCueSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Brooks-Scanlon Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of La.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Norfolk and Western Railway Company v. Conley, Attorney General of the State of West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Mississippi Railroad Commission v. Mobile & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Delaware, L. & W. R. v. Van SantvoordDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Chicago, M., St. P. & P. R. Co. v. Board of Railroad Comm'rs.Montana Supreme Court · 1953