Legal Opinion

Donohue v. Pomeroy

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by Charles Donohue and another against William L. Pomeroy. From an order denying his motion for a further bill of particulars, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, P. J.

The action was brought to recover the value of certain services claimed to have been rendered by the plaintiffs as attorneys for the defendant, and also for certain disbursements. In response to the defendant’s demand for a bill of particulars, the plaintiffs served an itemized bill, but none of the items of service has its value affixed to it, and the bill of particulars, after enumerating the items of service, claims a gross sum. It would appear .that the services were rendered in different actions, and in advising the defendant as to his affairs generally. Thereupon the defendant made a…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cullinan v. McColganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. Hasty v. BaysSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. Moore v. ScharnikowWashington Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API