Tiger Oil Corp. v. Department of Licensing
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBridgewater, J.
— Tiger Oil Corporation appeals a trial court order ruling, as a matter of law, that Tiger Oil is not entitled to a direct refund of taxes it paid on special fuel used for a tax-free purpose. We hold that Tiger Oil is entitled to a refund and remand for further proceedings to determine the amount due.
Tiger Oil buys special fuels from distributors and sells it to special fuel users, but does not have a Washington special fuel dealer’s license. Tiger Oil claims that it pays taxes to Washington at the time it purchases special fuels. Tiger Oil does not charge its customers the tax if they can…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Seven Gables Corp. v. MGM/UA Entertainment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- State v. VerharenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Stiles v. KearneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- State Ex Rel. Quick-Ruben v. VerharenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Skimming v. BoxerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Skimming v. BoxerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.