Legal Opinion

Tangler v. Vill. of Carrollton

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 5, 2018No. 17 CA 0920PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGES: Hon. Gene Donofrio, Hon. Cheryl L. Waite, Hon. Carol Ann Robb

OPINION

DONOFRIO, J.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, the Village of Carrollton, appeals the judgment of the Carroll County Court of Common Pleas denying its motion for summary judgment regarding political subdivision immunity.

{¶ 2} Appellant is a political subdivision as defined under Ohio law. Plaintiffs-appellees, Christopher and Brittany Tangler, reside on Courtview Drive inside appellant's jurisdiction. This action concerns a sewer system that is operated and maintained by appellant which services appellees' residence.

{¶ 3} The…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Byrd v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Hoyt, Inc. v. Gordon & Associates, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Greene County Agricultural Society v. LimingOhio Supreme Court · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCullough v. Youngstown School Dist.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Martin v. PayneOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. Luke v. Short Creek Joint Fire Dist.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025
  4. James v. New MiddletownOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API