Legal Opinion
Most Worshipful Sons of Light Grand Lodge Ancient Free & Accepted Mason v. Sons of Light Lodge Number 9
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 3, 1949No. Civ. 13948PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
This is a motion by respondents to dismiss an appeal on the ground that the judgment appealed from is interlocutory and therefore not appealable.
The present motion affects but one of the two appeals now pending between these parties. It appears from the record that respondents had been affiliated with appellants in a grand lodge and subordinate lodges of a Negro Masonic fraternity. Respondents withdrew their affiliation from appellants, claiming that the latter had falsely and fraudulently represented that they were the lawful and exclusive Masonic lodges in California for Negroes. Upon such…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Lyon v. GossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Hough v. HoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Doudell v. ShooCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Zappettini v. BucklesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of San Diego v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Confidential, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Degnan v. MorrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Peninsula Properties Co. v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Most Worshipful Sons of Light Grand Lodge v. Sons of Light Lodge No. 9California Court of Appeal · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.