Legal Opinion

Mississippi Valley Portland Cement Co. v. United States

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided August 16, 1972No. Civ. A. Nos. 3970, 3969 and 3968Published

1Opinion of the Court

*241OPINION OF THE COURT

DAN M. RUSSELL, Jr., Chief Judge.

In the three above numbered causes, plaintiff, a Mississippi corporation, seeks tax refunds paid for five taxable years ending January 31, 1961 through January 31, 1965. Plaintiff operates in two capacities, that of a miner of calcium carbonate rock deposits from its quarries in Mississippi, and as a producer of cement in its cement producing plant located within fifty miles of the quarries. Both parties agree that plaintiff is entitled to compute its depletion deduction under the proportionate profits method (26 U.S.C. § 613) inasmuch as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Standard Lime and Cement Company (Formerly Known as the Standard Lime and Stone Company) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  2. United States v. California Portland Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  3. United States v. Ideal Basic Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  4. United States v. Portland Cement Company of UtahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
  5. Southwestern Portland Cement Company, a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API