Legal Opinion
Lewis v. Fahn
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 12, 1952No. Civ. 8123PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
A demurrer was sustained to plaintiffs’ second amended complaint. No request was made for leave to further amend and no further amendment having been proffered judgment followed in favor of defendants, from which judgment this appeal is taken.
The complaint contains three counts. The first is for the recovery of moneys paid under duress; the second is supplementary to the first'; and the third is an action to recover moneys alleged to be due by contract. By the first count plaintiffs alleged the following: On May 19,1944, they entered into a written lease with defendants whereby they leased…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Philpott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Millsap v. National Funding Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1943
- Young v. HoaglandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Steffen v. Refrigeration Discount Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
- Ramp Buildings Corp. v. Northwest Building Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Richard Douglas Furnish and Emilie Furnish Funk v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Hayward Union High School District v. MadridCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- United States v. McBrideDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
- Keithley v. Civil Service BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Eckstein v. EcksteinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.