Fishel v. Lueckel
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
In Equity. Bill by Aaron A. Fisliel, Abraham I. Adler, and Samuel Schwartz against August Lueekel, William Unger, and Henry Heininger for infringement of copyright.
1Opinion of the Court
TOWNSEND, District Judge.
In this case the complainants are the owners of six copyrights for certain engravings and etchings. Under an agreement with the defendants, the Brooklyn Photogravure Company, of New York, manufactured copies of said pictures, omitting from said copies the tiut, title, and plate mark, and shipped them in this condition to London, where it caused the tint, title, and mark to be put on, and delivered the finished pictures to defendants. The defendants deny infringement, because, as they claim, the copies were not complete without tint, title, and plate mark, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stevens v. GladdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Drury v. EwingU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1862
- Richardson v. MillerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1877
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rushton v. VitaleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Greenbie v. NobleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Rushton v. VitaleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- M. Witmark & Sons v. CallowayDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1927
- Shapiro, Bernstein & Co. v. VeltinDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.