United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. McFerson
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke
These parties occupy the same relative position here as in the trial court, and we so refer to them.
Plaintiff was surety to the state for a bank in which state funds were deposited. The bank failed. The surety company paid the state, which, by its treasurer, assigned the account to plaintiff. Claiming that the state was a preferred creditor, and that it was subrogated to that status, plaintiff brought this action to enforce that preference. Defendant answered, and plaintiff demurred generally. That demurrer was overruled and plaintiff elected to stand. Thereupon defendant, on his motion, had…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. State Bank of NCSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- State ex rel. Rankin v. Madison State BankMontana Supreme Court · 1923
- American Bonding Co. of Baltimore v. ReynoldsDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1913
- Green v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1876
3Cited by14 opinions
- City of Lincoln v. RickettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Ghingher v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
- Matter of Estate of BenneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Holbrook Irrigation District v. First State BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
- Shaw v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.