Legal Opinion

Wiser v. Montana Board of Dentistry

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 2011No. DA 10-0230PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

¶1 Lee Wiser and Charles Conlan appeal from the Order of the First Judicial District Court, Lewis and Clark County, granting summary judgment to the Montana Board of Dentistry (BOD) on res judicata grounds. We affirm.

¶2 Did the District Court err in concluding that Appellants’ claims against BOD were barred by res judicata?

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶3 Appellants/Plaintiffs Wiser and Conlan are licensed denturists. BOD is responsible for regulating the practice of denturitry. These parties appeared before this Court in Wiser v. State (Wiser I), 2006 MT 20, 331 Mont. 28, 129 P.3d 133. In…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lorang v. Fortis InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Baltrusch v. BaltruschMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Brault v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Fox v. 7L Bar Ranch Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Mattson v. Montana Power Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brilz v. Metropolitan General InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Touris v. Flathead CountyMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Denturist Ass'n v. State, Department of Labor & IndustryMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Medical Marijuana Growers Ass'n v. CorriganMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Olsen v. MilnerMontana Supreme Court · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API