Legal Opinion

Fields v. Carlton

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 1, 1885PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Estates. Ejectment. Remainders. Privity. Administrators and Executors. Husband and Wife. Sales. Attorney and Client. Evidence. Betterments. Equity. Charge of Court. Before D. A. Vason, Esq., Judge pro hao vice. Dougherty Superior Court. April Term, 1885. Reported in the decision

1Opinion of the Court

Jackson, Chief Justice.

An action of ejectment was brought by Ida R. Carlton and Lillian Janes against Taylor Fields for the recovery, of two city lots on Flint street, in Albany, with the improvements thereon, their title resting on the will of their father, which gave them a remainder estate in all the property he left, after paying his debts. To this suit, Fields filed two pleas, one the general plea of not guilty, and the other an equitable plea, setting up that he is an innocent purchaser for value without notice, and,- if not protected by that fact in his title, that he was, at all…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dean v. FeelySupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  2. McPhee v. Guthrie & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1874

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co. v. BarkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Taylor v. KempSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  3. Wilson v. WoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  4. Dudley v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  5. Estate of Brinckwirth v. TrollSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API