Legal Opinion

Ryan v. The Procter & Gamble Company

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided June 26, 2023No. 1:20-cv-00556Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ROBERT RYAN, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:20-cv-556 v. JUDGE DOUGLAS R. COLE THE PROCTER & GAMBLE U.S. BUSINESS SERVICES COMPANY, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER In recent years, Robert Ryan had wrist and knee injuries—and resulting surgeries. His employer-sponsored health plan from Procter & Gamble offered him only limited partial disability benefits, so he administratively appealed—and eventually sued—seeking more. In Ryan’s view, he is Totally Disabled under the benefit plan’s definition of that term. Unfortunately for him,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lloyd Marks v. Newcourt Credit Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. Karen McClain v. Eaton Corp. Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  3. Tanner v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
  4. Kenny v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API