Vandefifer v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.
Francis Vandefifer was convicted of aggravated sexual abuse and assessed punishment by the jury at twenty years confinement. He appeals on four grounds of error based on the trial court’s refusal to grant a new trial. We overrule all grounds and affirm the judgment.
Vandefifer first argues he should have been granted a new trial because he was prevented from using a peremptory challenge to excuse Juror Marilyn Zanolli Hart. Vandefifer was charged with sexually abusing John Henthorne, a thirteen-year-old boy. During voir dire of the jury panel, defense counsel asked if…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Albrecht v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Sneed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- McDonald v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Drousche v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Groh v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Townsend v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1989
- Bryan Nesbitt v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.